Co-Design of Privacy, Cost Optimization, and Security in Cloud-Native Distributed Data Platforms for Telecommunications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-3882Keywords:
Cloud-Native Architecture, Distributed Data Platforms, Telecommunications, Co-Design, Privacy Engineering, FinOps, Zero Trust Architecture, Metadata-Driven ETLAbstract
Telecommunications organizations face mounting pressure to manage data infrastructure that is simultaneously scalable, cost-efficient, privacy-compliant, and secure. Existing literature addresses these dimensions in isolation, producing systems that satisfy one objective while degrading others. This paper proposes a unified co-design framework that treats privacy, cost, and security as first-order design constraints rather than sequential additions, applied specifically to cloud-native distributed data platforms in the telecommunications sector. The framework is instantiated through a metadata-parameterized pipeline architecture that enables configuration-driven ETL orchestration, partition-based distributed parallelism, and dynamic workflow routing. Six quantitative formulas are introduced to characterize system performance: a throughput model, a cost reduction index, a configuration reusability factor, a data exposure surface metric, a security coverage depth measure, and an identity governance completeness index. Evaluation against a representative telecommunications data environment demonstrates a pipeline throughput of 2.4 TB/hr at 87% parallel efficiency, a 34% reduction in cloud infrastructure cost relative to traditional deployment models, and a 41% reduction in data exposure surface following tiered privacy enforcement. Security coverage depth reached 0.94 across six independent security layers, and identity governance completeness attained 89% of managed lifecycle events. The framework is validated against GDPR Article 5(1)(c), CCPA Section 1798.100, CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model v2.0, and NIST IR 8505 guidance for cloud-native data protection. Findings indicate that co-design enables measurable, simultaneous improvement across all three constraint dimensions without the performance penalties characteristic of sequential integration approaches.