Classroom Silence as Multidimensional Student Engagement in the Digital Era: Evidence from Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-5301Keywords:
Classroom silence, Student engagement, Higher education, Phenomenology, Thematic analysis, Multidimensional model, Teaching and learning, Classroom interactionAbstract
The transformation of higher education in the digital era has expanded the ways students access information, communicate, and participate in learning, challenging traditional assumptions that visible verbal participation is a sufficient indicator of student engagement. Within this changing educational environment, classroom silence may reflect not only disengagement but also cognitive processing, socio-emotional regulation, culturally shaped participation, and responses to pedagogical conditions. This study examines classroom silence as a multidimensional form of student engagement in higher education by considering cognitive, socio-emotional, cultural, and pedagogical dimensions. A qualitative research approach was employed using semi-structured interviews and non-participant classroom observations involving 40 participants, comprising 30 students and 10 faculty members from a state university in the Philippines. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns in participants’ experiences and interpretations of classroom silence. The findings indicate that classroom silence is a dynamic and context-dependent form of participation. Cognitively, silence provides opportunities for information processing, reflection, and meaning-making. Socio-emotional factors, including anxiety, confidence, and fear of negative evaluation, influence students’ decisions to participate verbally. Cultural norms related to respect, communication, and language further shape participation, while pedagogical practices and classroom conditions influence whether silence facilitates or constrains engagement. Based on these findings, the study develops the Silence Engagement Model (SEM), which integrates these dimensions to explain variations in the meaning and function of classroom silence. The findings extend conventional understandings of student engagement by recognizing internal and non-verbal forms of participation and provide evidence for interpreting student engagement more contextually in contemporary higher education. The study further highlights the need for inclusive and responsive learning environments that recognize diverse forms of participation across increasingly face-to-face, blended, and technology-mediated educational contexts.