Recovery Debt: A Drift-Aware Verification Framework for Provable Recoverability in Hybrid VMware and Cloud Estates

Authors

  • Venkata Ravi Sridhar Potunuru Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Newton, Massachusetts, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-5975

Keywords:

disaster recovery testing, recovery debt, configuration drift, hybrid cloud, VMware Site Recovery, RTO/RPO validation, continuous validation, infrastructure as code

Abstract

Disaster recovery testing has not kept pace with how quickly modern hybrid infrastructure changes between test cycles. Chaos engineering, the discipline most closely associated with resilience validation today, assumes infrastructure is disposable: a region or availability zone can be destroyed deliberately and rebuilt from code, and the exercise itself validates both the failure response and the underlying automation. That assumption breaks down for the large population of enterprises still operating persistent VMware estates alongside cloud platforms, where tearing down a production virtualization layer is neither safe nor practical. Lacking a testing discipline suited to that constraint, most hybrid organizations default to calendar-based recovery testing, typically quarterly or annual, which certifies recoverability only for the moment the test executed. This article introduces recovery debt: a measure of the accumulating gap between an environment's last validated recovery state and its current live state, driven by configuration drift, undocumented infrastructure growth, and organizational change occurring between test cycles. Building on that measure, it proposes a drift-aware verification framework consisting of a tiered, non-destructive drill taxonomy suited to non-disposable infrastructure, paired with an automated trigger that schedules revalidation based on measured infrastructure change velocity rather than a fixed calendar. The framework is evaluated against documented operational testing practice, current industry survey data on disaster recovery readiness, and a retrospective practitioner account of an enterprise ransomware recovery used to illustrate where calendar-based assumptions held and where they understated risk. Organizations operating durable hybrid infrastructure need a measurable, auditable way to know whether a recovery plan validated months ago still reflects the environment it is meant to protect; this article argues that recovery debt is that measure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Venkata Ravi Sridhar Potunuru. (2026). Recovery Debt: A Drift-Aware Verification Framework for Provable Recoverability in Hybrid VMware and Cloud Estates. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(21s), 1996–2006. https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-5975

Issue

Section

Original Articles